mo' money, mo' money, mo' money
work's been demanding most of my time this week, so the only major studio update i have right now is "my bank account is getting smaller and smaller every day."
i went to hizzy depot yesterday to order my 3.5" unfaced insulation. everyone who carries standard 3.5" insulation carries the faced version, because no one but studio people have a need for the unfaced stuff. in order to insulate all the walls in the studio, it would cost me around $160 to get a bunch of rolled of the regular faced insulation. i fully expected to spend more for special-ordering the unfaced insulation.
but what i didn't expect was for the total to come to $1500. that's right, $1500. i'm being charged almost 10 times as much simply to get insulation which does not have a sheet of paper glued onto it. i spent about 45 minutes talking this over with the guy at the contractor desk, and he called owens-corning 3 times to make sure we had all the right numbers and everything. in the end, it became clear that 3.5" unfaced insulation really is such a rarely-asked-for thing that it does in fact cost nearly 10x as much as the normal faced insulation.
i know what you're going to say. "dude, just by the faced stuff and rip the paper off." believe me, this was the first thing i thought of. however, i have been unable to locate any testimonials from people who have successfully done this in a studio setting. which makes me a bit hesitant to try this, because if i do it and it proves to be problematic for whatever reason (residual glue effectively behaving like another leaf in the wall assembly, insulation ripping too much, insulation being too thin and not compressing enough, etc.), i most likely won't know there's a problem until after everything is built, at which point it would cost significantly more than $1500 to rectify. so i just decided to bite the bullet and fork over the money to at least have the peace of mind that the stuff i'm getting will definitely work.
meanwhile, back at the ranch, the HVAC guy has been doing some research regarding whole-house dehumidification and hasn't turned up much, at least not for carrier systems. the $9k system he spec'ed out for me does have a dehumidifier, but that's the only drawing point of that system. however, that $9k number includes the condensing unit, and he says that like the cheaper system i was tentatively going to go with, i can wait and replace the condensing unit later on in the spring. figuring at least $3.5k for the condensing unit, that brings the price of the hefty system down to $5.5k (or less). given that a central dehumidification system will cost me at least $1500 anyway, that price gap starts closing pretty rapidly. plus the infinity system lets you control the humidity from the t-stat, which is a huge bonus.
i've been going back and forth with regards to just how important dehumidification is. like i've mentioned before, during the summer humidity isn't too much of an issue since the A/C is by nature a dehumidifier. and during the winter months, you're adding heat without adding to the specific humidity, so that process is effectively a dehumidifier as well. but the real problem is around this time of year and in the spring, when the outside temperature is such that you don't run either the a/c or the heater all that much. currently, the living room humidity is 53%. i haven't been downstairs yet today, but i can guarantee it's at least 60%, which is at least 15% higher than needed for that space.
we're tentatively scheduled to do the studio ductwork sometime this week, and i'm going to call kevin on monday to review dehumidification options. at this point, i'm leaning towards biting the bullet and going with the hefty system. if nothing else, it will solve the dehumidification problem and will be slighlty quieter and more energy-efficient than the cheaper system.


